<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alex Priest &#187; democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexpriest.com/tag/democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexpriest.com</link>
	<description>Alex Priest&#039;s personal blog, on marketing, social media, technology, politics, and life in general.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:40:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Tis the Season for Some More Reform</title>
		<link>http://alexpriest.com/2010/03/30/tis-the-season-for-some-more-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://alexpriest.com/2010/03/30/tis-the-season-for-some-more-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Priest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Climate Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theeagle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexpriest.com/?p=719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My latest column in my university’s newspaper is up today, here at The Eagle. However, I&#8217;d recommend reading it here, and avoid the nonsense juvenility that seem to be the trend among other columnists and commenters there nowadays. This week &#8230; <a href="http://alexpriest.com/2010/03/30/tis-the-season-for-some-more-reform/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My latest column in my university’s newspaper is up today, <a title="The Eagle" href="http://www.theeagleonline.com/opinion/story/carry-on-with-the-fight-democrats/" target="_blank">here at The Eagle</a>. However, I&#8217;d recommend reading it here, and avoid the <a href="http://www.theeagleonline.com/opinion/story/dealing-with-aus-anti-sex-brigade/" target="_blank">nonsense juvenility</a> that seem to be the trend among other columnists and commenters there nowadays. This week I urge Democrats to continue working on their reforms. They can get a lot more accomplished this year&#8211;and win in November&#8211;if they time their messages right and play of the context based on the time of year. Sometimes it&#8217;s the simple things. Check it out below.</p>
<p><span id="more-719"></span>Congratulations, Democrats. You’ve got a lot to be proud of. Significant health care reform has finally become a reality for the United States after a year of contentious debate. But moreover, the political tides have clearly shifted in your favor.</p>
<p>While we have won this battle, we have not won the war, that war being the rest of President Obama’s ambitious agenda.</p>
<p>Many may be tempted to say, let’s take it easy. We can back off major legislation, and press on in 2011 with the 112th United States Congress.</p>
<p>For God’s sake don’t do that.</p>
<p>This year presents enormous opportunity for passing more than just health care reform, all the while improving our chances of winning in November. You just have to play the cards right, and at the right time.</p>
<p>Dear President Obama, Speaker Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Reid:</p>
<p>As the key figures setting the legislative agenda, the cards are in your collective hands. Combatting the 24/7, conflict-addicted, Tea Party-obsessed news cycle will not be easy, but by timing your messages right, I’m pretty confident you can get not just one more reform done this year, but three.</p>
<p>First, tackle education reform. Everyone knows education is a politically safe topic. Few are opposed to it, and most on both sides of the aisle recognize the abysmal failure that was No Child Left Behind. In addition, few politicians are willing to raise the same kind of ruckus for education as they did for health care. It’s for the kids, after all.</p>
<p>If you pass a bill by the middle of May, you can even tie your message to the end of the school year. Imagine the headlines: “American students celebrate summer; America celebrates a new era of high-quality education.”</p>
<p>Secondly, duke it out for the climate bill. One version has already passed the House, and there is bipartisan support in the Senate. It will still be a tough fight, but the climate — the weather, not the political climate — will work in your favor.</p>
<p>Remember the ignorant skepticism of global warming because of the unusual snowfall in Washington this past winter? That same mentality applies in reverse, too. As the temperatures increase so will belief in global warming.</p>
<p>As more Americans travel and the economy improves, gas prices will rise, sparking more demand for energy reform and investments to reduce our dependence on oil. Nobody likes paying $4 a gallon for gas.</p>
<p>On top of that, hurricane season kicks off on June 1, and with it, the approaching five-year anniversary of the devastating Hurricane Katrina. Scientific evidence shows a correlation between global warming and hurricane activity, and fear of another Katrina will be just one more factor adding to popular support of a bill to combat climate change.</p>
<p>Finally, wrap up the year with immigration reform. Activists are already demanding it — although their rally on March 21 was largely drowned out by the health care debate.</p>
<p>As holidays approach, Americans will be more sympathetic to immigrant families being torn apart due to unfair immigration policy. In addition, the myriad of holidays celebrated serves to underscore the diversity in America, providing an excellent backdrop for the immigration debate.</p>
<p>The media won’t mind either. Passing a bill by Christmas would mean more heartwarming tales of immigrant families together for the holidays. Let them have that story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexpriest.com/2010/03/30/tis-the-season-for-some-more-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let &#8216;em Talk</title>
		<link>http://alexpriest.com/2010/03/06/let-em-talk/</link>
		<comments>http://alexpriest.com/2010/03/06/let-em-talk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Priest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bunning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcdonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[message]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaparty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theeagle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexpriest.com/?p=683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My latest column in my university’s newspaper is up today, here at The Eagle. This week, I’m focusing on the performance of Democrats in the media and how to handle (or not handle) their messaging alongside that coming from Republicans. &#8230; <a href="http://alexpriest.com/2010/03/06/let-em-talk/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My latest column in my university’s newspaper is up today, <a href="http://www.theeagleonline.com/opinion/story/advice-for-dems-let-the-others-talk/">here at The Eagle</a>. This week, I’m focusing on the performance of Democrats in the media and how to handle (or not handle) their messaging alongside that coming from Republicans. With the way Republicans have handled their message&#8211;Tea Party and all&#8211;my advice is pretty simple. Let &#8216;em keep on talking, the only people they&#8217;re going to hurt is themselves.</p>
<p>The full column is below the cut. Check it out and let me know what you think.</p>
<p><span id="more-683"></span>Democrats aren’t doing half bad right now. So far 2010 actually isn’t looking nearly as dire as it was just after pseudo-Republican Scott Brown won the Kennedy seat in Massachusetts.</p>
<p>If Democrats keep up the hard work and continue to ignore tea partiers—radical conservatives and ultra-liberals like they have been—they might just survive this year. Nevertheless, here’s a little advice.</p>
<p>Dear Democratic Strategists,</p>
<p>You’re doing alright. Behind all the tea party crazy talk and “Washington is broken” nonsense, the news cycle seems to be trending your way.</p>
<p>Predicting the news cycle is a difficult thing to do. Sometimes it’s rough for Democrats, sometimes it hits the GOP where it really hurts.</p>
<p>This is supposed to be a rough year for Democrats. President Barack Obama’s policies haven’t sailed through as smoothly as we hoped. Hardly anyone’s happy with Congress, and it consists mostly of Democrats. So it’s all bad news for the Democratic Party, right?</p>
<p>I’m not so sure. Look at the news from Tuesday just this week, for example.</p>
<p>The leading headline in the Wall Street Journal was “Deal Near on Banking Rules,” one of the Democrats’ key policy items. Point for us.</p>
<p>Let’s look at others. “Tea Party Holds Risks for GOP.” Minus one for Republicans.</p>
<p>“Fed Void Clears Path for Obama,” “Manufacturing Shows Strength,” “Bailout Update: AIG’s repayment means U.S. is close to getting back half of its IOUs.” Point, point, point for Democrats.</p>
<p>And then there’s darling Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., holding up unemployment benefits for millions of Americans.</p>
<p>“One Senator Holds Up Bill, in New Level of Gridlock,” proclaims the WSJ. And then Tuesday evening: “Deal Reached to End Senator’s Holdout.” Point.</p>
<p>“Well that’s just one paper!” conservatives might protest (never mind the fact that the Wall Street Journal typically leans right). Sure, but The Washington Post’s headlines tell the same story.</p>
<p>Oh, and see that cover story in the Metro section? It exposes Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell of Virginia as the hypocrite he is, lobbying for education funding from the Recovery Act he’s been lobbying against since last year. Point.</p>
<p>So the media momentum has shifted left a bit. But we can’t just sit back and be passive, can we? “We can’t let Republicans control the agenda and the message!” say paranoid political strategists on the left.</p>
<p>Well, maybe not completely. But lately they’ve done a good job digging themselves into a hole without your help, Democrats.</p>
<p>So, let ‘em talk.</p>
<p>The Tea Party is a joke. Every time Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck opens their mouth, people ridicule them across the political spectrum. Ron Paul? Not much of a threat when the Republican establishment still loathes him. Let them talk.</p>
<p>The “Party of No” is still just saying “no,” as evidenced by Bunning’s ignorant protest of the unemployment bill. If all the public hears is “no,” let ‘em talk.</p>
<p>Finally, the stimulus bill is working, the economy continues to improve and Obama is working hard to find solutions to our debt problem.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Republicans continue to pan his economic proposals, as if they weren’t going home to hypocritically take credit for the stimulus. Let ‘em talk; it’s only hurting them.</p>
<p>So Democrats, for now I think you should just ride the wave. Let the Republicans screw up their own messaging—you just focus on getting things done. The people will notice. You act, let them talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexpriest.com/2010/03/06/let-em-talk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Picking the Winning Issues</title>
		<link>http://alexpriest.com/2010/02/03/picking-the-winning-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://alexpriest.com/2010/02/03/picking-the-winning-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Priest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dontaskdonttell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasvegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexpriest.com/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama is on a roll. In fact, I&#8217;d argue that he&#8217;s on such a roll, few people quite realize it. And even more importantly, I don&#8217;t think Republicans see it coming. Could he save 2010 for the Democrats? Two things &#8230; <a href="http://alexpriest.com/2010/02/03/picking-the-winning-issues/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is<em> on a roll</em>. In fact, I&#8217;d argue that he&#8217;s on such a roll, few people quite realize it. And even more importantly, I don&#8217;t think Republicans see it coming.</p>
<p>Could he save 2010 for the Democrats? Two things that have happened in the past 24 hours suggest, to me, that he may be figuring out the strategies it takes to salvage these midterms.<strong> </strong>Simply put, he&#8217;s figuring out the winning issues (hint: health care is not one of them).</p>
<p><strong>Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; has been a divisive issue for a long time. For years, it was accepted by the majority, while it infuriated gays and allies behind the scenes. Upon Obama&#8217;s election, he pledged to repeal the policy, but last year saw little action on that front. This week we&#8217;ve seen the action liberals have been waiting for and it&#8217;s making the GOP look petty, homophobic and, especially in the case of Senator John McCain, lacking convictions on the issue. Three things that make this one a winner for Obama and the democrats:</p>
<ol>
<li>Public opinion has shifted and a majority now favor repealing the policy</li>
<li><a title="top defense officials support end of policy" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/03/us/politics/03military.html" target="_blank">Top defense officials</a> support an end to the policy</li>
<li>Republicans can&#8217;t make up their mind&#8211;John McCain, in particular, <a title="McCain flip-flops" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/02/AR2010020202588.html" target="_blank">flip-flopping on the issue</a> since October 2006</li>
</ol>
<p>Keep pushing this until it happens, Obama. This shifts focus away from the economy a bit, gives you a <em>lot</em> of support from your liberal base (which you desperately need if you want to mobilize voters come November), and will make for plenty of heart-warming stories about gays being able to be &#8220;themselves&#8221; when the policy is finally ended.</p>
<p><strong>AIG Bonuses</strong></p>
<p>Now this could really go either way, but with Obama holding the momentum and public approval on the rise since the State of the Union, I&#8217;m feeling confident this will, ultimately, work in democrats favor.</p>
<p>As most of us know, <a title="AIG bonuses" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704022804575041300793298866.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews" target="_blank">AIG is readying another $100 million round of bonuses</a> for its executives. Naturally, this infuriates about 99% of all Americans. Here&#8217;s the deal, three things to remember for this one:</p>
<ol>
<li>Obama didn&#8217;t start the bank bailouts, <a title="AIG bailout" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_International_Group#Financial_crisis" target="_blank">Bush did</a>, way back in 2008</li>
<li>Everyone hates AIG, and democrats have been doing a better job showing outrage over this issue than Republicans have&#8211;Republicans have to worry about losing wealthy, corporate donors and voters for November</li>
<li>This adds support for Obama&#8217;s proposed financial regulations&#8211;regulations Republicans have been pretty adamantly opposed to thus far</li>
</ol>
<p>Keep up Obama. If you can show that this is <em>your</em> issue and that you&#8217;re willing to tackle it head on&#8211;as opposed to the Republican skirting around the issue&#8211;you can make this a real winner and start pulling around your approval rating on economic issues.</p>
<p><strong>Behind the Scenes: Demonizing Las Vegas</strong></p>
<p>Now this is pure conjecture on my part, but I&#8217;ve got a feeling <a title="Obama on Las Vegas" href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/79437-obama-responds-to-reid-about-las-vegas-remarks" target="_blank">Obama&#8217;s recent flap on Las Vegas</a>, and subsequent apology in response to Senator Harry Reid&#8217;s outrage, are very planned events</p>
<p>First of all, <a title="Not the first time" href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA_LAS_VEGAS?SITE=KVNU&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT" target="_blank">this isn&#8217;t the first time</a> this has happened. Now I&#8217;m not about to suggest Obama is above making the same mistake twice, but this is a tense political climate and he knows his good friend Harry Reid is up for re-election. Now what could possibly help Senator Reid at this juncture in the race&#8230;?</p>
<p>How about a show of strength? A little bravado from our fearless Senate Majority Leader? Well that&#8217;s what he got. Obama&#8217;s comment on Las Vegas gave Senator Reid an excellent opportunity to complain&#8211;loudly&#8211;and Obama immediately issued a formal apology for the comment.</p>
<p>Not only does this help Senator Reid immensely&#8211;now he can say he fights hard for his state&#8217;s largest city, <em>and</em> he&#8217;s willing to stand up to President Obama, <em>and</em> he understands the pain Nevadans are feeling and wants to help fix it&#8211;but it&#8217;s an event that, outside of Nevada, will only last in this news cycle for about two hours. The majority of Americans will ignore the story altogether, and even less will care. Nevadans are the only ones who will hear it, the only ones who will care, and Reid&#8217;s approval rating will go up. This might not help Obama&#8217;s approval in the state, but really, who cares? Politics is a short-term game, and Obama&#8217;s got almost three years before Nevada voters go back to the polls for him. There&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexpriest.com/2010/02/03/picking-the-winning-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Angry Press, Stalled Agenda</title>
		<link>http://alexpriest.com/2010/02/01/angry-press-stalled-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://alexpriest.com/2010/02/01/angry-press-stalled-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Priest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gibbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theeagle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexpriest.com/?p=537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My latest column is out in the AU Eagle, and boy is it timely. My column is basically an extension of this post, which I had written back on January 20th. They focus on Press Secretary Robert Gibbs and how, &#8230; <a href="http://alexpriest.com/2010/02/01/angry-press-stalled-agenda/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My latest column <a title="Angry Press, Stalled Agenda" href="http://www.theeagleonline.com/opinion/story/angry-press-stalled-agenda/" target="_blank">is out in the AU <em>Eagle</em></a>, and boy is it timely. My column is basically an extension of <a title="Quit Pissing Off the Press, Gibbs" href="http://alexpriest.com/2010/01/20/quit-pissing-off-the-press-gibb/" target="_blank">this post</a>, which I had written back on January 20th. They focus on Press Secretary Robert Gibbs and how, honestly, I think he&#8217;s doing a pretty miserable job with the press right now. Today only exacerbates this, as esteemed ABC journalist Jake Tapper basically <a title="Gibbs vs. Tapper" href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/robert-gibbs-and-jake-tapper-spar-over-democrats-weakness/" target="_blank">got into it</a> in the pressroom. It&#8217;s kind of embarrassing, and it&#8217;s not serving the President well. Anyway, check out my column via the link above, or just click the &#8220;read more&#8221; to read it right here on my blog.</p>
<p><span id="more-537"></span>After a stinging loss in Massachusetts, miserable polling and ever-lower expectations for the November midterm elections, there has been plenty of advice going around for Democrats. Last week, I counted no less than five such articles and editorials in Sunday’s Washington Post.</p>
<p>Miraculously, President Barack Obama seems to be changing the game. His State of the Union address, high-speed rail announcement and “question time” at the GOP retreat were three powerful wins in a row for him and for the Democratic party.</p>
<p>But not all is well and good. To fully recover from the recent tailspin of negative coverage, one person in particular needs to straighten up. The Obama administration’s main spokesman for the press, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, simply hasn’t been doing his job well. I’ve got some tips.</p>
<p>Dear Mr. Gibbs,</p>
<p>Quit pissing off the press. Sound complicated? It’s not.</p>
<p>It’s no secret the Obama White House has been getting more and more negative coverage by the press in recent days. Sure, there’s a lot of bad news being steered in your direction, but a press that gets along well with the press secretary might be a bit more inclined to break bad news more gently.</p>
<p>The press isn’t irritated with President Obama himself. Nor are they against his policies. Many journalists, statistically speaking, lean left anyway. In fact, I’m sure they quite like him as a person, too. According to a poll from late December, 58 percent of all Americans hold a favorable opinion of him personally.</p>
<p>This is all about the communicator. That’s you, Mr. Gibbs. You’re getting on their nerves, and because of that, you’re failing at your job to communicate White House policy effectively. Two weeks ago Dana Milbank at the Washington Post wrote a scathing column criticizing your “usual mix of wisecracks of insults,” your “glib Gibbs gibes,” and referring to you as “smart-alecky” and “combative.” Not good.</p>
<p>Then the weekend after that, liberal MSNBC news and radio host Ed Schultz told the nation about an unpleasant encounter with you. He told you that you were “full of sh-t”, and then you dropped the f-bomb right back.</p>
<p>Now you’re saying Mr. Schultz was misleading viewers in order to “get viewers to watch his show.” Not cool, Mr. Gibbs. Not cool at all.</p>
<p>There are three things you need to do to get out of the White House Press Corps’ doghouse.</p>
<p>First, quit being so political. You’re the press secretary. Yes, you should defend the administration, but you’re not campaigning anymore. Give them the news, answer the questions and spin as necessary. Don’t campaign — you already work in the White House; you can worry about re-election next year. Focus on your message, not everyone else’s.</p>
<p>Secondly, chillax. Not every question is an attack on Obama, and if you keep snapping at the media, they aren’t going to be nice to you in their columns that they write in newspapers with far more readers than this one.</p>
<p>Finally, give the press the respect they deserve. These people are keeping you relevant. And for the most part, they’re also being nice to the Obama administration; in 2009 they gave you the most balanced coverage in history, about 49 percent positive and 51 percent negative, according to the Center for Media and Public Affairs. If you want anything close to that in 2010, you’d better shape up.</p>
<p>Your bad attitude only results in one thing and that’s more columns like this. Obama’s doing a nice job recovering — don’t ruin it for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexpriest.com/2010/02/01/angry-press-stalled-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama on the Rebound?</title>
		<link>http://alexpriest.com/2010/01/30/obama-v2-0-or-is-this-a-reboot/</link>
		<comments>http://alexpriest.com/2010/01/30/obama-v2-0-or-is-this-a-reboot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 04:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Priest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[questiontime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sotu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stateoftheunion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexpriest.com/?p=530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could we be seeing a new Obama this week? There&#8217;s no question the American public has seen a complete about-face in strategy for our young President, in only a matter of days. There&#8217;s no question that last week&#8211;filled with &#8220;Republican &#8230; <a href="http://alexpriest.com/2010/01/30/obama-v2-0-or-is-this-a-reboot/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could we be seeing a new Obama this week? There&#8217;s no question the American public has seen a complete about-face in strategy for our young President, in only a matter of days. There&#8217;s no question that <em>last week&#8211;</em>filled with &#8220;Republican outrage&#8221;, a &#8220;disastrous&#8221; election in Massachusetts for the Democrats, and the &#8220;final demise&#8221; of health care reform&#8211;was a miserable week to be a Democrat. And there&#8217;s <strong>no question</strong> the Obama administration figured this out, and with the hiring of David Plouffe at the end of the week as a formal adviser, they&#8217;ve also acted on it.</p>
<p>This week is proof. Wednesday night&#8217;s <a title="State of the Union 2010" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/01/27/putting-washington-service-middle-class" target="_blank">State of the Union speech</a> was not a complete revolution in the rhetoric, but it was far more detailed, passionate, and blunt than I think anyone really expected. And the American public seem to have received it well, with <a title="83%!" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/01/27/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry6149049.shtml" target="_blank">83% of speech watchers approving of his proposals</a>.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="300" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="bgcolor" value="282828" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="flashvars" value="file=http://www.whitehouse.gov/videos/2010/January/012710_StateoftheUnion.m4v&amp;path_to_plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins&amp;path_to_player=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player&amp;skin=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/skins/EOP_skin.swf&amp;captions_url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/av_closedcaption/final012710_The_2010_State_Of_The_Union_Address.srt,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/es_012710_The_2010_State_Of_The_Union_Address_Spanish.srt&amp;image=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/audio-video/video_thumbnail/SOTU-2.jpg&amp;controlbar=bottom&amp;frontcolor=AAAAAA&amp;plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/privacy/privacy,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/hat/hat,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/share/share,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/captions/captions&amp;captions.file=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/av_closedcaption/final012710_The_2010_State_Of_The_Union_Address.srt,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/es_012710_The_2010_State_Of_The_Union_Address_Spanish.srt" /><param name="src" value="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/player.swf" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="300" src="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/player.swf" flashvars="file=http://www.whitehouse.gov/videos/2010/January/012710_StateoftheUnion.m4v&amp;path_to_plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins&amp;path_to_player=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player&amp;skin=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/skins/EOP_skin.swf&amp;captions_url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/av_closedcaption/final012710_The_2010_State_Of_The_Union_Address.srt,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/es_012710_The_2010_State_Of_The_Union_Address_Spanish.srt&amp;image=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/audio-video/video_thumbnail/SOTU-2.jpg&amp;controlbar=bottom&amp;frontcolor=AAAAAA&amp;plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/privacy/privacy,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/hat/hat,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/share/share,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/captions/captions&amp;captions.file=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/av_closedcaption/final012710_The_2010_State_Of_The_Union_Address.srt,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/es_012710_The_2010_State_Of_The_Union_Address_Spanish.srt" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="282828" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Thursday we saw the <a title="High-Speed Rail" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/01/29/one-step-closer-future-high-speed-rail" target="_blank">bold announcement of a new high-speed rail proposal</a>, utilizing $8 billion of stimulus funds. This announcement is a huge deal for each state involved, and is a pretty well-supported investment. God knows I can&#8217;t wait for a high-speed trip to NYC from DC.</p>
<p>Finally, in one of the most glorious demonstrations of American democracy I&#8217;ve ever seen in my lifetime, we had a direct question and answer session with President Obama and House Republicans Friday afternoon. Not only was it pleasantly surprising to see the GOP actually <em>invite</em> our Democratic President to come speak with them but, to put it bluntly, he absolutely schooled them.</p>
<p>He shot down their accusations. He legitimized and substantiated his proposals. He took them to task for their ridiculous politicizing and demonization of his policies. He did <em>everything</em> right. Have you seen it? You need to. <em>Especially </em>if you&#8217;re a Republican. I&#8217;ll join with journalists all over the Internet calling for this to be a regular occurrence. Let&#8217;s make &#8220;question time&#8221; happen all the time. Hell, let&#8217;s put it in the Constitution. Anything to make this kind of reasoned, even, logical debate happen more often and in public.</p>
<p>Have you seen the video? Watch it below. Miss the State of the Union? Check out the video embedded above.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="300" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="bgcolor" value="282828" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="flashvars" value="file=http://www.whitehouse.gov/videos/2010/January/012910_BaltimoreMD.m4v&amp;path_to_plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins&amp;path_to_player=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player&amp;skin=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/skins/EOP_skin.swf&amp;captions_url=&amp;image=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/audio-video/video_thumbnail/P012910PS-0437-2.jpg&amp;controlbar=bottom&amp;frontcolor=AAAAAA&amp;plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/privacy/privacy,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/hat/hat,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/share/share,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/captions/captions&amp;captions.file=" /><param name="src" value="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/player.swf" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="300" src="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/player.swf" flashvars="file=http://www.whitehouse.gov/videos/2010/January/012910_BaltimoreMD.m4v&amp;path_to_plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins&amp;path_to_player=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player&amp;skin=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/skins/EOP_skin.swf&amp;captions_url=&amp;image=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/audio-video/video_thumbnail/P012910PS-0437-2.jpg&amp;controlbar=bottom&amp;frontcolor=AAAAAA&amp;plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/privacy/privacy,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/hat/hat,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/share/share,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/captions/captions&amp;captions.file=" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="282828" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>In the end, it&#8217;s been a good week for Democrats. And it&#8217;s been a great week for Obama. I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;d call this Obama v2.0 as much as a return to Obama v1.0, after a regression to Obama v0.5.</p>
<p>Consider this a rebound. Obama is back in the game. Maybe it was a wake-up call from Massachusetts, maybe it was advice from David Plouffe, or maybe it was simply Obama deciding it was time to change the way he&#8217;s been doing things. Regardless, I like it. I think this is a good thing for Democrats, a good thing for Obama, and a good thing for America. And look at how quickly the past week has changed things&#8211;if nothing else, this week should teach us all that things in politics can change <em>incredibly</em> quickly. We&#8217;ve got about ten months between now and November, I have no doubt Republicans will have good weeks and Democrats will have good weeks. Here&#8217;s hoping we can see more &#8220;question time&#8221;-style debate, more civil debate and more productivity on Capitol Hill between now and then, too.</p>
<p><strong>Edit:</strong> Thanks so much to <a title="Andi Narvaez" href="http://www.andinarvaez.com/" target="_blank">Andi Narvaez</a> (<a title="@andinarvaez" href="http://twitter.com/andinarvaez" target="_blank">@andinarvaez</a>) for the tip on &#8220;Rebound&#8221; instead of &#8220;Reboot&#8221;. Flows much better, and certainly more contextually appropriate given his appearance at today&#8217;s Georgetown v. Duke game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexpriest.com/2010/01/30/obama-v2-0-or-is-this-a-reboot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

